Every coding agent knows your code. Almost none of them know your work, the Jira issue that kicked it off, the Confluence doc that explains the trade-offs, the decisions made last sprint, or the team that owns the outcome. The result: agents that sound confident and build the wrong thing.

We're going to show you the difference. Live. Side-by-side.

Same task, same agent. Once flying blind, once powered by Jira, Teamwork Collections, and the Teamwork Graph. We'll run it across RovoDev, Claude, Codex, Gemini, and Cursor so you can see exactly where context changes everything. No slides. No hand-waving. Just the delta, in real time.

We'll also pull back the curtain on Agentic Jira, agents that can be assigned, @mentioned, and wired into your workflows right now, and make the case for why context, not the model, is the real moat in the agentic age.

Key takeaways:

• See the gap: a live, side-by-side demo of the same agent with and without organisational context. The difference is undeniable.
• Set it up yourself: concrete patterns to connect agents to Jira, Confluence, Bitbucket, and third-party sources via Teamwork Collections.
• Why Atlassian wins here: the Teamwork Graph is a structural advantage that composes with any coding agent your team already uses.